Showing posts with label Wikileaks Leaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wikileaks Leaks. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Bradley Manning: top US legal scholars voice outrage at 'torture'

More than 250 of America's most eminent legal scholars have signed a letter protesting against the treatment in military prison of the alleged WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning, contesting that his "degrading and inhumane conditions" are illegal, unconstitutional and could even amount to torture.
The list of signatories includes Laurence Tribe, a Harvard professor who is considered to be America's foremost liberal authority on constitutional law. He taught constitutional law to Barack Obama and was a key backer of his 2008 presidential campaign.

Tribe joined the Obama administration last year as a legal adviser in the justice department, a post he held until three months ago.

He told the Guardian he signed the letter because Manning appeared to have been treated in a way that "is not only shameful but unconstitutional" as he awaits court martial in Quantico marine base in Virginia.

The US soldier has been held in the military brig since last July, charged with multiple counts relating to the leaking of thousands of embassy cables and other secret documents to the WikiLeaks website.

Under the terms of his detention, he is kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, checked every five minutes under a so-called "prevention of injury order" and stripped naked at night apart from a smock.

Tribe said the treatment was objectionable "in the way it violates his person and his liberty without due process of law and in the way it administers cruel and unusual punishment of a sort that cannot be constitutionally inflicted even upon someone convicted of terrible offences, not to mention someone merely accused of such offences".

The harsh restrictions have been denounced by a raft of human rights groups, including Amnesty International, and are being investigated by the United Nations' rapporteur on torture.

Tribe is the second senior figure with links to the Obama administration to break ranks over Manning. Last month, PJ Crowley resigned as state department spokesman after deriding the Pentagon's handling of Manning as "ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid".

The intervention of Tribe and hundreds of other legal scholars is a huge embarrassment to Obama, who was a professor of constitutional law in Chicago. Obama made respect for the rule of law a cornerstone of his administration, promising when he first entered the White House in 2009 to end the excesses of the Bush administration's war on terrorism.

As commander in chief, Obama is ultimately responsible for Manning's treatment at the hands of his military jailers. In his only comments on the matter so far, Obama has insisted that the way the soldier was being detained was "appropriate and meets our basic standards".

The protest letter, published in the New York Review of Books, was written by two distinguished law professors, Bruce Ackerman of Yale and Yochai Benkler of Harvard. They claim Manning's reported treatment is a violation of the US constitution, specifically the eighth amendment forbidding cruel and unusual punishment and the fifth amendment that prevents punishment without trial.

In a stinging rebuke to Obama, they say "he was once a professor of constitutional law, and entered the national stage as an eloquent moral leader. The question now, however, is whether his conduct as commander in chief meets fundamental standards of decency".

Benkler told the Guardian: "It is incumbent on us as citizens and professors of law to say that enough is enough. We cannot allow ourselves to behave in this way if we want America to remain a society dedicated to human dignity and process of law."

He said Manning's conditions were being used "as a warning to future whistleblowers" and added: "

I find it tragic that it is Obama's administration that is pursuing whistleblowers and imposing this kind of treatment."

Ackerman pointed out that under the Pentagon's own rule book, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Manning's jailers could be liable to prosecution for abusing him. Article 93 of the code says "any person who is guilty of cruelty toward any person subject to his orders shall be punished".

The list of professors who have signed the protest letter includes leading figures from all the top US law schools, as well as prominent names from other academic fields. Among them are Bill Clinton's former labour secretary Robert Reich, President Theodore Roosevelt's great-great-grandson Kermit Roosevelt, the former president of the American Civil Liberties Union Norman Dorsen and the writer Kwame Anthony Appiah.

Source: AnonOps

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

WikiLeaks reveals smuggled uranium in the Philippines

MANILA, Philippines - The WikiLeaks website on Wednesday released a confidential cable from the United States embassy in London revealing the possible illicit smuggling of radioactive material in the Philippines in 2007.


The cable was dated November 21, 2007 and was marked as “sensitive”.


The cable revealed that an unidentified male called the US Foreign Service National Investigator (FSNI) unit on November 20, 2007 and revealed he had information about the "possible sale of uranium that formerly belonged to the US."


"The FSNI unit received a phone call from subject, xxxxxx, stating he had worked with divers in the Philippines previously and was recently contacted by them with information that they had found 5-6 Uranim 'bricks' at the sight (sic) of an underwater wreck," the cable said.


It said the caller's contacts expressed a desire to sell the radioactive material for profit.


On the same day, the Regional Security Office Investigation Unit received an unclassified e-mail with 9 photo attachments of the radioactive bricks.


The cable said the unidentified male had sent faxes to the US Embassy and the Central Intelligence Agency but had yet to receive a response. T


At the time the memo was issued, Philippine authorities had not been notified. It noted that the supplier/ origin point and intended destination of the material was still unknown.


The Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, meanwhile, said the sensitive cable raises questions on why US forces are bringing radioactive material in Philippine territory.


Bayan secretary general Renato M. Reyes, Jr. said that under the Visiting Forces Agreement, Philippine authorities are not allowed to inspect the warships of the US forces and US commanders merely issue a general statement certifying the contents of the vehicles.


“Was there a US ship that sunk, and is this what’s being described as the underwater wreck? Was this ship nuclear-powered?” Reyes asked.


Reyes also sought a response from the Department of Foreign Affairs if they were at anytime notified of such a situation and if there were any reports of US ships sinking anywhere in the Philippines.


“Does the DFA even know about this or were they at any point formally notified by the US government? Or was this kept a secret because it will expose the US government’s violation of the constitutional ban on nuclear weapons?” Reyes asked.


Source: ABS-CBN

Sunday, January 30, 2011

FOREIGN WORKER AND LABOR PROBLEMS IN QIZ FACTORY: Wikileaks Leaks


Reference IDCreatedReleasedClassificationOrigin
10CAIRO1952010-02-11 16:042011-01-28 00:12CONFIDENTIALEmbassy Cairo


VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHEG #0195/01 0421606
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 111606Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY CAIRO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0225
INFO RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 0002


C O N F I D E N T I A L CAIRO 000195 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR NEA/ELA, DRL/ILCSR
DEPT PASS TO USTR/SFRANCESKI AND GSTRICKLER

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/11
TAGS: ECON ELAB ETRD EG PGOV
SUBJECT: FOREIGN WORKER AND LABOR PROBLEMS IN QIZ FACTORY

REF: 09CAIRO0561; 08CAIRO2528

CLASSIFIED BY: Donald Blome, Minister-Counselor, DOS, ECPO; REASON:
1.4(B), (D)

1. (C) Key Points:



-The manager of a ready-made garments factory participating in the
Qualifying Industrial Zones (QIZ) program told EconOff that his
company has been holding the passports of foreign workers and that
it fired an Egyptian employee for organizing a strike.



-This is first case of passports of foreign workers being held by a
QIZ-participating employer that EmbOffs have encountered in regular
visits to QIZ factories.



-Embassy Cairo has raised the issue with the GOE. The Ministry of
Trade and Industry has pledged to investigate the matter, and will
inform us soon of their planned response to the case.



-Despite this case, NGO's engaged in labor advocacy tell us that
working conditions and labor standards are generally better in QIZ
factories than in other private and public-sector factories.



2. (C) EconOff recently met with Oussama Abboud, the Managing
Director for the Kazareen Textile Company, an Egyptian garment
exporter participating in the Qualifying Industrial Zones (QIZ)
program. Kazareen reports $50 million in annual sales, with its
biggest contracts coming from Wal-Mart and the New York-based
Warnaco Group, the parent company for such brands as Calvin Klein,
Speedo, and Chaps.



--------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------

Passports of Foreign Workers Held, Strike Broken

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------
-----



3. (C) Abboud said that he legally brought in approximately 60
Bangladeshi workers to work in his factory in 2008, joining some
1,700 Egyptians on Kazareen's overall staff. (Note: Egyptian labor
regulations limit the non-Egyptian workforce to 10%). Abboud
bluntly told EconOff that Kazareen management held onto to the
passports of the Bangladeshis. He complained that some of the
Bangladeshi workers came to Egypt to use it as a "gateway" to
illegally immigrate to Europe, and that about half of his
Bangladeshi workers have since left Egypt for Italy via boat from
Libya. The workers left Egypt without their passports, since they
could not get them back from Kazareen.



4. (C) Abboud also said that he overcame a day-long work stoppage
in April 2009 by firing the strike's leader, who had attempted to
organize the workforce. With the dismissal of the strike leader,
all of the other strikers returned to work, and there have been no
further efforts to organize.



-----------------------------------------

GOE Response to the Case

----------------------------------------



5. (C) EmbOffs raised the USG's concern about the holding of
foreign workers' passports to two different GOE ministries. The
Ministry of Manpower and Emigration (MOMM), which handles labor


issues, denied that such a phenomenon exists in Egypt. However, the
Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI), which handles the QIZ
program, has pledged to investigate the case and respond.



6. (C) In a January 21 meeting with EmbOffs, Assistant Minister of
Manpower and Emigration Mervat Wahby said that MOMM has never
discovered any cases of foreign worker's passports being held in
Egypt. Wahby noted that her ministry has 600 labor inspectors who
monitor factory conditions in Egypt's 29 governorates.



7. (C) EconOff raised the issue of the alleged labor problems at
the Kazareen factory to Haytham Abdel-Ghany, the Registration and
Audit Manager at the QIZ Unit in the Ministry of Trade and Industry
(MOTI). Abdel-Ghany expressed the ministry's concern about the
alleged mistreatment, and said that the issue had been referred to
Minister of Trade and Industry Rachid Mohamed Rachid to decide what
action should be taken. Abdel-Ghany told us on February 10 that
MOTI is investigating the case, and will inform Embassy Cairo soon
of its plans to deal with the matter. Abdel-Ghany emphasized that
this was an "individual case," and that MOTI had not heard of any
other QIZ factory holding the passports of its foreign workers.



--------------------------------------------- ---

Bangladeshi Embassy Response

--------------------------------------------- ---



8. (C) Harun Rashid, Charge d' Affairs at the Embassy of Bangladesh
in Cairo, told EconOff that cases of mistreatment of Bangladeshi
workers, including the holding of passports, is a phenomenon that
is "happening all the time" in Egypt. Rashid said that the
Bangladeshi Embassy has received numerous complaints from its
nationals about it in the past, but has only heard 1-2 complaints
in the past year. Rashid was unsure if there had been a previous
case of such mistreatment in a QIZ factory, and noted that many
past cases involved non-QIZ companies. Rashid says that the
Bangladeshi Embassy does not raise complaints about such cases with
the GOE, but instead appeals directly to factory managers to
improve the conditions for Bangladeshi workers.



--------------------------------------------- ---------------

Labor Conditions Generally Better in QIZ's

--------------------------------------------- ---------------



9. (C) Local NGO's advocating for labor rights report that working
conditions are generally better in QIZ factories, compared to other
manufacturers in Egypt. According to the Land Center for Human
Rights, a workers' rights advocacy group, salary and benefits are
particularly better in QIZ factories than in other private sector
factories. However, according to the Land Center, the lack of a
union representation that plagues Egypt's private sector in general
is also an issue in QIZ factories.



--------------

Comment

--------------



10. (C) This case marks the first time a QIZ company has told us
directly that it holds the passports of foreign workers. In
pressing for an expansion of the QIZ program, MOTI has insisted
that factories operating in QIZ's uphold proper labor standards and
abide by QIZ rules. QIZ Unit officials have stated that labor
problems previously associated with Jordanian QIZ's have not
occurred in Egypt's QIZ's, and QIZ Unit officials have been

particularly sensitive to comparisons between the Jordanian and
Egyptian programs. Embassy Cairo will follow up on the issue with
MOTI as it prepares a response to the case.



11. (C) EmbOffs have visited a number of factories in the past
several months, and have not heard similar reports regarding
foreign workers in the factories that may employ up to 10% foreign
labor, typically from South Asia. Despite this recent case, labor
conditions -- driven primarily by strong compliance programs of
garment buyers -- are generally better in factories participating
in the QIZ program than in those not participating in the program.
SCOBEY

Original Link

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Anonymous DDoS Attack started on Egyptian Sites


The group Anonymous, known for staging web attacks on PayPal and MasterCard in support of Wikileaks, has called for volunteers to stage a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against web sites run by the Egyptian government.



The group's Facebook page, called "Operation Egypt" carries messages about the Egyptian protests, and also a picture of a recruiting poster with an IRC channel as well as a "care package" to download. The rest of the page has news and updates from Egyptian and foreign sources.
Clicking on the info page leads to a site that says it isAnonOps, a group that was formed from within the collective that launched the attacks on PayPal. However, they say they did not attack any web sites.
ANONYMOUS-PRESS-RELEASE_26-01-2011.jpg (800×1131)
Latest ANONYMOUS PRESS RELEASE 26-01-2011



Meanwhile the group has asked, via the IRC chat rooms, that users access aweb-based version of a program called Low Orbit Ion Cannon or download it, according to reports from netcraft.com, which publishes news on online security. The software stages DDoS attacks and was originally written as a stress-testing application.
The sites slated for attack, the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology and the Ministry of the Interior appear to be up and running, so if a DDoS attack was staged it hasn't been effective.
The Internet has been an arena for conflict during the protests, as Twitter reported that it has been blocked in that country.
And latest news is that they are already attacked on http://www.egyptiancabinet.gov.eg/ & http://www.mfa.gov.eg/ 
There current target : http://mcit.gov.eg/ those other sites have been totally taken down by anonoperatives.
Source: Operation Egypt Facebook Fanpage

Saturday, January 22, 2011

WikiLeaks: US courted Dutch Muslims after Van Gogh murder


An all-expenses-paid study trip to the US: that was the offer to a number of prominent Dutch Muslims following the killing of controversial filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004. Now WikiLeaks documents reveal that these trips were part of a concerted effort by Washington to win the hearts and minds of Dutch Muslims. Among them was the current Mayor of Rotterdam, Ahmed Aboutaleb.
Nordin Ghoudani was one of those fortunate enough to be offered such a trip after being invited for a number of conversations at the US Embassy. Now that he is aware of being a cog in the wheel of US policy, he tells Dutch broadcaster NOS that he looks back on the trip with mixed feelings.
“The knowledge that Washington, and former president George W Bush, insisted on these trips... yes, that puts things in a different perspective.”
Poorly integrated
On 2 November 2004, the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh at the hands of a radical Muslim sent shock waves through the Netherlands. Van Gogh had collaborated with politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the film Submission, a fierce indictment of the position of women in Islam. The US authorities examined the situation and came to the conclusion that the Netherlands was home to the most poorly integrated Muslim community in Europe.
The Dutch Muslims were described as strongly anti-American, an attitude that Washington was keen to change. Diplomats were ordered to seek contact with leading members of the Muslim community. They organised Ramadan dinners and offered study trips to the US for the select few. It was all done with the aim of cultivating greater understanding for the US and America’s views.
Nordin Ghoudani describes how it worked.
“I had a couple of discussions. We were invited, together with a number of Muslims. Eventually I was also selected to take part in a programme in the US, the Edward Murrow Programme. Yes, that took me to America for a couple of months.”
Equal footing
The programme Nordin Ghoudani refers to is an American study programme for foreign journalists. There the Muslims were courted by the Americans. One of the participants, Ahmed Larouz, praises the Americans’ egalitarian approach as something that might serve as an example to many Dutch politicians.
“I have to be honest: the conversations were always positive and took place on a very equal footing. I think they were better than some talks with other political parties in the Netherlands.”
One year after the launch of its charm offensive, the US Embassy in The Hague reported that the number of Muslim contacts being maintained had risen from 50 to 131. And diplomats say that number is still growing.
Government minister
The most prominent of these contacts is Ahmed Aboutaleb, then Executive Councillor of Integration in Amsterdam and current Mayor of Rotterdam. Reporting on WikiLeaks documents, the NOS says Americans describe him as one of their best Muslim contacts. He too enjoyed an all-expenses-paid three-week study trip to the US.
Mr Aboutaleb told local Rotterdam station Radio Rijnmond that he was not a US informer. He explained that as Amsterdam alderman at the time of the Van Gogh murder he spoke to a wide range of people "from all over the world" about the integration of Muslims in the Dutch capital. "And I paid for the tickets to the US with my own money," Mr Aboutaleb added.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

U.S. push for Israeli, Palestinian intelligence: WikiLeaks

The United States instructed its Middle East diplomats in 2008 to gather data on encrypted Israeli communications and build financial and "biometric" profiles of Palestinian leaders, a leaked embassy cable shows.
The secret memorandum, signed by then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and published by Wikileaks, suggests the Bush administration fretted about lacking intelligence despite warm ties to Israel and the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority (PA).
Citing the needs of U.S. analysts, the October 31, 2008 cable presented envoys in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and several Arab states with an exhaustive and prioritized list of data regarding the "Palestinian Issues" being brokered by Washington.
These included "evidence of Government of Israel support for or opposition to actions to limit and/or reduce settlement and outpost growth" on occupied land where Palestinians want to establish a state.
Settlement growth has been one of the chief obstacles to negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.
Written two months before Israel's surprise offensive in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, the cable sought "details on Israel Defense Forces (IDF) operations underway or planned" against Palestinian militants, "including targeted assassinations and tactics/techniques used by ground and air units".
Diplomats were asked for a comprehensive overview of Israel's high-tech communications, from Internet and cellphones to state-run "information repositories associated with radio frequency identification (RFID)-enabled systems used for passports, government badges, and transportation systems".
The cable sought updates on the movements and private contact details of Israeli civilian and military officials as well as "biographical, financial and biometric information on key PA and Hamas leaders and representatives, to include the young guard inside Gaza, the West Bank and outside".

Source: Reuters

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

WikiLeaks' Assange: China is our real enemy

China is the worst state offender in terms of censorship but WikiLeaks is getting past its attempts to restrict access, the website's founder Julian Assange said in an interview published on Wednesday.
Assange, whose website has angered and embarrassed Washington by releasing confidential U.S. diplomatic cables, said China was the main technological enemy of WikiLeaks, not the United States.
"China has aggressive and sophisticated interception technology that places itself between every reader inside China and every information source outside China," Assange told Britain's New Statesman magazine.
"We've been fighting a running battle to make sure we can get information through and there are now all sorts of ways Chinese readers can get on to our site," he said in extracts of the interview published on the magazine's website.
U.S. officials have been examining whether criminal charges can be brought against Assange since WikiLeaks began publishing the cables. He again denied working with Bradley Manning, a U.S. Army intelligence analyst suspected of leaking the files.
On Tuesday, a U.S. court ordered microblogging site Twitter to hand over account information on Assange and Manning as well as other WikiLeaks supporters. [IDnN08244942] Assange accused U.S. authorities of using Manning, who was arrested in the first half of last year, to build a case against him.
"Cracking Manning is the first step," he said. "The aim is clearly to break him and force a confession that he somehow conspired with me to harm the national security of the United States."
So far WikiLeaks has issued just a small proportion of the 250,000 cables it has obtained. Assange denied that the website was in trouble and repeated previous statements that files would still be released whatever happened to him or WikiLeaks.
He also told the New Statesman that as-yet unreleased "insurance" files included cables about Rupert Murdoch and his News Corp media empire (NWSA.O).
"There are 504 U.S. embassy cables on one broadcasting organisation and there are cables on Murdoch and News Corp," he said. WikiLeaks has previously said it would release documents relating to a major U.S. bank, believed to be Bank of America.
Assange is now staying at a country mansion in Britain while on bail awaiting possible extradition to Sweden where he is wanted for questioning over alleged sex crimes.
His lawyers warned on Tuesday that, if extradited, he could eventually end up in the United States facing the death penalty. [ID:nLDE70A0VV]
"They don't want the public to know these things and scapegoats must be found," Assange told the New Statesman.

Source: Reuters

Anonymous Declaration of Freedom

Join us on January 15th for the first in a series of global protests in defense of WikiLeaks and freedom of expression. Stand with us to defend your freedoms.






Source: AnonOps

Open letter to the Department of Justice

To Whom It May Concern

We are regretful of your actions to attempt to retrieve information from Twitter about the account belonging to "Wikileaks", as by doing so you are attempting to remove the anonymity of the poster and by extension, their right to speech. We are confused as to why you have brought such a subpoena against Twitter, as there is little information you will gain from these details, leaving comments and observations on the world are to our understanding; not a criminal offence

Is this not the same type of action that you, DOJ, find reprehensible in other countries? How do you justify the same action in the US? No crime has been committed yet you assume that the populace at large will just "roll over" as always and allow this intrusion.

The time has come for the people of the world to take an active part in governing their own lives and freedoms. The world must become aware that its freedoms are in jeopardy. Today, Twitter, tomorrow, what? Recent events have shown that people are becoming tired of being treated this way. Why push an unwinnable confrontation when working for the same goal is always more productive (learn from history).

The US Government expressed concern over the Tunisian Government's actions when they attacked protesters' Facebook accounts. Is there a difference here? They attack and you use the "law" (loosely defined) to in essence do the same thing. What's the possible difference? Your motives are the same.

Yours Faithfully

Anonymous
We do not forgive. We do not forget.

Source: AnonOps

Why Twitter Alone Stood Up To the Government

The government has almost certainly made secret requests for WikiLeaks-related material from other companies. But only Twitter (successfully at least) fought to have those orders brought into the open. Here's why.
Secret subpoenas of the kind the Department of Justice sent Twitter are apparently not unusual. In fact, other tech companies may also have received similar WikiLeaks-related requests. But what is unusual in this story is that Twitter resisted. Which raises an interesting question: Assuming that Twitter was not the only company to have been served a secret subpoena, why was it the only company that fought back? The answer might lie in the figure leading Twitter's legal efforts, Alexander Macgillivray (below right), an incredibly mild mannered (really) but sharp-as-a-tack cyber law expert.
Twitter's general counsel comes out of Harvard's prestigious Berkman Center for Internet and Society, the cyber law powerhouse that has churned out some of the leading Internet legal thinkers. The center was founded a little over a decade ago by none other than Charles Nesson, the famous defender of Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg. While at Harvard, Macgillivray helped teach a course on the law of cyberspace, along with Wendy Seltzer, a fellow at Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy. Today Seltzer leads the Chilling Effects clearinghouse, a collaboration between several law schools and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which tracks legal challenges to lawful online activity.
Why Twitter Alone Stood Up To the GovernmentAfter Harvard, Macgillivray worked as a litigator for Silicon Valley super-firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati before moving to Google, where he first spearheaded legal issues for products like Search and Gmail. He soon found himself enmeshed in the fractious Google Books lawsuit. Observers credit Macgillivray's agile mind and creative thinking with architecting with the Google Books Settlement—a solution that both enabled Google to lawfully scan the contents of university libraries and to create a mechanism for authors and publishers to get their out-of-print books back into circulation.
Twitter wooed Macgillivray away from Google in the summer of 2009, and he now heads a 25-person legal team. Throughout his career, he has remained an avid student of Internet and intellectual property law, and calls himself a tinkerer of sorts—his personal website is called "bricoleur," a French term he says refers to one who "[tries] things out until they figure out how to do something."
Macgillivray also curates a Twitter list of the primary thinkers tangling with cyber issues, and he has occasionally returned to Berkman to guest lecture or speak on topics of the day. Coincidentally, a week before the DOJ subpoena, Macgillivray was tweeting about a government analysis looking at which criminal statutes might apply to the WikiLeaks-style publication of leaked classified documents.
Twitter has declined to comment on the original subpoena and the company's fight to get it unsealed. What we do know is that the original order was faxed to Twitter on December 14. On January 5, the same magistrate who signed the first order, signed a new one, ordering the first to be unsealed. And on January 7, Twitter sent notifications to at least several of the holders of the accounts listed on the subpoena, telling them the company would respond to the order in 10 days, unless "we receive notice from you that a motion to quash the legal process has been filed or that this matter has been otherwise resolved."
It's reasonable to assume that Macgillivray is the person who either led or played a significant role in the thinking that resulted in the decision to challenge the secrecy aspect of the order. If so, it's a smart move.
Whatever Twitter might feel about the subpoena (and we at Fast Companyhaven't seen any sign that it feels strongly one way or the other—though the notice to the account holders did conveniently include contact information for both the EFF and the ACLU), by making the subpoena public, Twitter takes itself out of the drama.
With this solution, Twitter gets to act the part of good citizen-both to its users and to the government. But it leaves the job of taking a stand on the appropriateness of the subpoena itself to the targets. And indeed, two have said they plan tocontest it. (One other said he is considering his options. The other two people named in the subpoena—other than the WikiLeaks account itself—are Julian Assange (who it's not clear actually has his own Twitter feed) and Bradley Manning, the accused leaker who is currently being held in a military jail.)
It's impossible to know whether other companies received similar subpoenas and, if so, whether they handed over the required information. That's because the orders' secrecy requirement forbids recipients from even acknowledging their existence. (The original Twitter subpoena reads: "[T]he application and this Order are sealed until otherwise ordered by the Court, and… Twitter shall not disclose the existence of the application and this Order of the Court, or the existence of this investigation, to the listed subscriber or to any other person, unless and until authorized to do so by the Court.")
Indeed, neither Google nor Facebook have responded to requests for comment on whether they were served with similar subpoenas. Which could mean either "Yes, we have but are prevented by law from acknowledging that," or "No, we haven't, and we simply aren't talking about it."
But it's not improbable that both have—and likely others as well. It appears that the attorney general conducting the investigation is interested in discovering who the account holders communicated with. While the Twitter subpoena does not ask for the content of messages—whether public or private—it does ask for records of addresses with which the accounts communicated. (See #B.2. on p. 4of the subpoena.)
To us, this looks like the government is using the records request as a tactic to ferret out who else might have been involved in the leak. If so, it would make sense to request records from Facebook, given that Manning reportedly statedthat, after deciding to leak classified materials, he had reached out to activists on Facebook. Similarly, if we were a U.S. Attorney on a fishing expedition, we would assume that Manning, Julian Assange, and the others named in the Twitter subpoena, might have Gmail accounts—in which case, it would make sense to request those records from Google as well. And to make similar requests to any other companies the targets might have used for similar communications.
WikiLeaks, for its part, certainly seems to think that Google and Facebook were served similar subpoenas. On January 7, WikiLeaks tweeted: "Note that we can assume Google & Facebook also have secret US government subpeonas (sic). They make no comment. Did they fold?"
We may never know. But if they did, it may in part be due to the fact that they did not have a cyber-law bricoleur like Macgillivray helping them think through their possible options.

Source: Gawker