Showing posts with label Wikileaks Article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wikileaks Article. Show all posts

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Freed Assange gives thanks

BRITAIN-US-DIPLOMACY-WIKILEAKS-COURT-BAIL
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange celebrates as he prepares to address the media outside the High Court in central London / AFP Source: AFP

WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange thanked his supporters and said it was great to breathe fresh air again after a British court ordered his release from jail. 
Speaking outside London High Court, Mr Assange, 39, paid tribute to "all the people around the world who have had faith in me."
He also thanked: "members of the press who are not all taken in."
Mr Assange, who is fighting deportation to Sweden, where he faces sexual assault charges, said of the British justice system: "If justice is not always an outcome, it is at least not dead yet."
He added: "I hope to continue my work and continue to protest my innocence in this matter."

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in London High Court for bail fight


Julian Assange
Julian Assange in the back of a prison van as he arrives at London's High Court to fight for bail. Source: Getty Images
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will tonight hear if he is to be freed on bail after more than a week in prison following his arrest on a Swedish warrant for questioning about alleged sex crimes. 
The 39-year-old Australian attended the hearing at London's High Court after being driven through the city from Wandsworth prison, where he has been held in solitary confinement virtually since his arrest on December 7.
He was granted bail on Tuesday, subject to electronic tagging, a curfew and a $A374,000 surety, but British lawyers acting for Sweden appealed the decision.
The appeal hearing began at 10.30pm (AEDT) and is expected to take several hours. Mr Assange's mother, Christine, and supporters including campaigning journalist John Pilger were in the packed courtroom.
Sweden wants Britain to extradite Mr Assange for questioning over claims of rape and sexual molestation against two women in Stockholm in August, which he denies and which his lawyers argue are politically motivated.
They cite the timing of his arrest, which coincided with the release by the whistle-blowing website of thousands of confidential US diplomatic cables, causing huge embarrassment and anger in Washington.
If released on bail, Mr Assange will have to live at the country estate of Vaughan Smith, a former British army officer who founded the Frontline Club, a media club in London where WikiLeaks has based part of its operations.
The subsequent extradition proceedings could take months.
Before he is freed, his supporters - including maverick US film director Michael Moore, campaigning socialite Bianca Jagger and journalist John Pilger, who was in court - must come up with the bail money in cash.
One of Mr Assange's lawyers, Mark Stephens, told journalists before the hearing: "We believe we will have the money today. It appears to be in the banking system."
He added of the bail appeal: "We are hopeful but of course it is a matter entirely for the judge."
The decision to challenge Mr Assange's bail was taken by British prosecutors acting on behalf of the Swedish authorities, but they were forced to defend the move after the Swedes said they had not been consulted on the decision.
Julian Assange
Julian Assange is led into London's High Court. His hearing is scheduled for 10.30pm (AEDT) tonight. Source: AFP
"The Crown Prosecution Service acts here as agents of the government seeking extradition, in this case the Swedish government," Britain's Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer told BBC radio.
Speaking as he arrived at court, Mr Pilger said: "I hope he will be released - he should be, he is an innocent man until proven otherwise.
"This is an extraordinary case. The amount of bail is ridiculous. Many people have questions to answer, among them the director of public prosecutions."
Thailand's royal family were the subject of the latest WikiLeaks revelations, as a leaked US diplomatic cable showed top palace officials expressed concern about the prospect of the crown prince becoming king.
Three influential Thai figures, including two senior advisers to revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej, "had quite negative comments about Crown Prince (Maha) Vajiralongkorn," said the memo from the US embassy in Bangkok dated January 2010.
Another cable also revealed that an oil platform in Azerbaijan operated by BP suffered a well blowout and a huge gas leak around 18 months before the Gulf of Mexico spill.
The news came as the US filed a lawsuit against the British energy giant and eight other companies for billions of dollars in damages over this year's devastating spill.
US President Barack Obama has led worldwide condemnation of WikiLeaks, dubbing their actions as "deplorable", and Washington is pursuing an investigation into how the website obtained the information.
But WikiLeaks and its founder have also won global support - hackers have attacked credit card and payment firms who restricted funds to the website, and more than 660,000 people have signed an online petition of support.

Britain opposed release of WikiLeaks founder

Julian Assange's lawyer Mark Stephens
Mark Stephens, a lawyer representing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, speaks outside City of Westminster Magistrates Court in London. Source: Getty Images

British authorities opposed bail for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, news reports state. 
Mr Assange was due back in a London court overnight SA time to fight for bail, after a judge's decision to free him was challenged on Tuesday.
It had been widely thought Swedish prosecutors had made the decision to oppose bail, with Britain's Crown Prosecution Service acting merely as its representative. But on Wednesday, the Swedish prosecutor's office told London's Guardian newspaper it had "not got a view at all on bail" and that Britain had made the decision to oppose bail.
A London judge is scheduled to hear arguments by British prosecutors seeking to overturn the ruling that Mr Assange can be released on bail while he fights a Swedish extradition request.
Lawyers for Mr Assange reacted to the news with shock and said prosecution officials had told them this week it was Sweden that had asked them to ensure he was kept in prison. "The question is why did they (CPS) make this decision if they said yesterday they were acting on behalf of the Swedish authorities?" Mr Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, said.
"Its fair to say that this is all a bit fishy.
"The whole case really reeks."
Karin Rosander, director of communications for Sweden's prosecutor's office, told the Guardian: "The decision was made by the British prosecutor.
"I got it confirmed by the CPS this morning that the decision to appeal the granting of bail was entirely a matter for the CPS.
"The Swedish prosecutors are not entitled to make decisions within Britain.
"It is entirely up to the British authorities to handle it."
As a result, she said, Sweden would not be submitting any new evidence or arguments to the High Court hearing. After the Swedish statement was put to the CPS, it confirmed all decisions concerning the opposing of bail being granted to Assange had been taken by its lawyers, the Guardian reported.
The CPS said: "In all extradition cases, decisions on bail issues are always taken by the domestic prosecuting authority.
"It would not be practical for prosecutors in a foreign jurisdiction to make such decisions."
Mr Assange has been in prison since his surrender a week ago to British police over a Swedish sex-crimes warrant.
He denies any wrongdoing.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

UN chief Ban Ki-Moon shares underwear information, makes light of WikiLeaks.

UN CHIEF Ban Ki-moon has revealed one of the secrets that did not come out on WikiLeaks: he is a boxers not briefs man.

The UN secretary general, who was allegedly the target of US orders to get personal details, mocked the leaked diplomatic cables in a tongue-in-cheek speech to the annual UN Correspondents' Association dinner late Wednesday.
Ban started his speech, to an audience that included US ambassador Susan Rice, by flashing details such as "credit card number" "shoe size" and "ring finger 7.5" onto the screen.
"Boxers not briefs" proclaimed one of the nuggets of information given to the diplomatic audience.
According to the leaked cables, reported by international media, US diplomats at the United Nations were told to find out the credit card numbers, email addresses, phone, fax and pager numbers and even frequent-flyer numbers for UN leaders.

Aussie launches 'business version of WikiLeaks'

AN AUSTRALIAN online electronics retailer has launched what he calls the business world's answer to WikiLeaks. 

The site allows internet users to post documents and tip-offs about dodgy business practices anonymously / File Source: Supplied

The site, Tradeleaks.com, allows internet users to post documents and tip-offs about dodgy business practices anonymously. Users can then rate and comment on the reliability of each leak.

Twenty-eight year old Ruslan Kogan, who featured on this year's BRW Young Rich list with a wealth of $29 million, made Tradeleaks.com available this morning.
A few hours after the website went live, there were ten allegations posted on the site about a mix of businesses and retailers.
'Fan' alleged that Foxtel* has an internal policy to offer one month’s free service to customers calling to "disconnect" their cable TV subscription.
Anonymous claimed that in his or her experience working at a "big TV retailer", he or she will: "play with the color (sic) settings on the TVs to ensure that the TVs that will earn us the most commission look better than the others."
"MY ADVICE TO CONSUMERS: If you are ever in a store buying a TV, ensure that you set all the color settings to "Factory Default" when comparing," said the post.
Mr Kogan said he hoped the site would eventually be filled with trade secrets and eventually become "bigger than WikiLeaks."
Mr Kogan denied that the website is an attempt to grab publicity for himself and his other businesses: "Someone could go on and post something [negative] about Kogan or my other business interests - we’re going to be judged on our transparency too… if it was [a publicity stunt] we’d put the Kogan logo on it."
"It's going to create a better shopping environment for consumers," Mr Kogan said.
"What this does is put all of the [internet’s business rumours and tip-offs] in one place; you're giving people one central place to say: 'I've worked here and here and they made me do this behind closed doors'," he said.
Mr Kogan said users can "post a leak" on the site directly in a system that will regulate itself, amid critics' warnings that there is no guarantee the information posted on the site is true or that its users’ personal details will be protected.
The site, which does not require a user name or evidence to back up claims, asks only that people "post credible information, including source documents where possible, which they believe consumers need to know."
"We put the power in the consumers’ hands, we let people decide what’s relevant and what’s not, whether they believe it or not..." he said.
"We’re not policing it and will only remove posts if they’re defamatory…you can post anything you want."
Asked what sort of security the site provided tipsters, Mr Kogan replied: “We’ve got legal firms and teams and we won't put up with personal attacks on anyone.
"We're encouraging people to provide evidence about claims - whatever they have we encourage them to upload it."
'This is no WikiLeaks'
Paul Ducklin, the head of technology for technical support firm Sophos' Asia-Pacific region, said that the website is no different to millions of existing internet forums that expose businesses to the risk of being slandered and their users to the risk of being identified.
"It is possible in all of this that innocent people could get slandered or libelled," Mr Ducklin said.
He contrasted Tradeleaks with WikiLeaks, which has a team of experts that decide when and whether to publish confidential information it has obtained.
"You have absolutely no idea who’s behind [the information on Tradeleaks], no indication of what’s going up and what’s not, there is no privacy policy," said Mr Ducklin.
"There's almost an anti-guarantee that people can post anything and we’ll publish it.
"[It's almost as if they are saying:] 'We don’t care what it is, we just ask you not to put naughty stuff up and it's up to others to remove it.'"

*Foxtel is owned by News Corporation, which is the parent company of the publisher of news.com.au.

Wikileaks Leaks: BP well blows in Azerbaijan

AN oil platform in Azerbaijan operated by BP suffered a well blowout and a huge gas leak around a year and a half before the Gulf of Mexico spill, leaked US diplomatic cables revealed today.

The British energy giant was lucky it managed to evacuate its 212 workers safely after the incident, which led to two fields being shut and output being dramatically cut, according to the cables released by website WikiLeaks.

The news came as the United States filed a lawsuit against BP and eight other companies for billions of dollars damages over the devastating Gulf oil spill, the worst in US history.

In the Azerbaijan incident, BP suffered the blowout in September 2008, as well as the gas leak which the firm acknowledged at the time, according to the cables, revealed in Britain's Guardian newspaper.

"Due to the blowout of a gas-injection well there was 'a lot of mud' on the platform, which BP would analyse to help find the cause of the blowout and the gas leak," said one of the US dispatches.

Another cable revealed that the company had a narrow escape after the gas did not catch fire.

"Given the explosive potential, BP was quite fortunate to have been able to evacuate everyone safely and to prevent any gas ignition," said the cable.

"[BP's then head of Azerbaijan, Bill] Schrader said although the story hadn't caught the press's attention, it had the full focus of the [government of Azerbaijan], which was losing '40-50 million dollars each day'."

The leak and blowout happened at the huge Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli (ACG) field in the Caspian Sea, just one of BP's operations in Azerbaijan, where it has a dominant position in the energy market.

It occurred on the Central Azeri platform, and the first signs of a problem were detected when bubbles appeared in the waters around the site, said one cable.

"Shortly thereafter, a related gas-injection well for Central Azeri had a blowout, expelling water, mud and gas," said the dispatch.

BP declined to comment on the incident, the Guardian reported. It told the paper that BP "enjoys the continued support and goodwill of the government and the people of Azerbaijan".

Details of the blowout emerged in cables that are part of a cache of around 250,000 US diplomatic dispatches, which were leaked to whistleblower website WikiLeaks and are being slowly released.

The Azerbaijan leak happened around 20 months before the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico, which sent nearly five million barrels of oil gushing into the sea.

The blast killed 11 workers, and the resulting torrent of oil fouled the environmentally fragile Gulf coasts for three months before it was capped.

"Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange" by Michael Moore


Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.

Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.

We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:

- Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."

- The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."

- Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

- Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a b*tch."

- Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."

- Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."

And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!

WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.

I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.

But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?

But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)

Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?

Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.

Instead, secrets killed them.

For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.

Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.

And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.

I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.

P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.

Iceland may ban MasterCard, Visa over WikiLeaks censorship

undefined
Credit card companies that prevented card-holders from donating money to the secrets outlet WikiLeaks could have their operating licenses taken away in Iceland, according to members of the Icelandic Parliamentary General Committee.

Representatives from Mastercard and Visa were called before the committee Sunday to discuss their refusal to process donations to the website, reports Reykjavik Grapevine.

"People wanted to know on what legal grounds the ban was taken, but no one could answer it," Robert Marshall, the chairman of the committee, said. "They said this decision was taken by foreign sources."

The committee is seeking additional information from the credit card companies for proof that there was legal grounds for blocking the donations.

Marshall said the committee would seriously review the operating licenses of Visa and Mastercard in Iceland.

WikiLeaks' payment processor, the Icelandic company DataCell ehf, said it would take immediate legal action against the companies to make donations possible again.

"DataCell who facilitates those payments towards Wikileaks has decided to take up immediate legal actions to make donations possible again," DataCell CEO Andreas Fink said last week. "We can not believe WikiLeaks would even create scratch at the brand name of Visa."

"It will probably hurt their brand much much more to block payments towards WikiLeaks than to have them occur," Fink added.

After news that the companies had stopped processing donations to the secrets outlet, those participating in an online campaign known as "Operation Payback" temporarily knocked the websites of Visa and Mastercard offline.

"This does clearly create massive financial losses to WikiLeaks which seems to be the only purpose of this suspension," Fink continued. "This is not about the brand of Visa, this is about politics and Visa should not be involved in this."

Neither company has offered a detailed explanation of why they stopped processing payments to WikiLeaks. MasterCard said only that WikiLeaks had acted in an "illegal" manner, in violation of the company's terms.

The companies still process payments to The Guardian and the New York Times, which have published leaked US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.

"I can use Visa and Mastercard to pay for porn and support anti-abortion fanatics, Prop 8 homophobic bigots, and the Ku Klux Klan," Jeff Javis noted at The Huffington Post. "But I can't use them or PayPal to support Wikileaks, transparency, the First Amendment, and true government reform. Just saying."

Last week, the Swiss bank Postfinance closed the account of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange because he gave "false information regarding his place of residence during the account opening process." Swiss authorities are investigating if the bank violated secrecy rules by publicly announcing that it had closed his account.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Wikileaks: Secret US Embassy Cables

Wikileaks began on Sunday November 28th publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. The documents will give people around the world an unprecedented insight into US Government foreign activities.
The cables, which date from 1966 up until the end of February this year, contain confidential communications between 274 embassies in countries throughout the world and the State Department in Washington DC. 15,652 of the cables are classified Secret.
The embassy cables will be released in stages over the next few months. The subject matter of these cables is of such importance, and the geographical spread so broad, that to do otherwise would not do this material justice.
The cables show the extent of US spying on its allies and the UN; turning a blind eye to corruption and human rights abuse in "client states"; backroom deals with supposedly neutral countries; lobbying for US corporations; and the measures US diplomats take to advance those who have access to them.
This document release reveals the contradictions between the US’s public persona and what it says behind closed doors – and shows that if citizens in a democracy want their governments to reflect their wishes, they should ask to see what’s going on behind the scenes.
Every American schoolchild is taught that George Washington – the country’s first President – could not tell a lie. If the administrations of his successors lived up to the same principle, today’s document flood would be a mere embarrassment. Instead, the US Government has been warning governments -- even the most corrupt -- around the world about the coming leaks and is bracing itself for the exposures.
The full set consists of 251,287 documents, comprising 261,276,536 words (seven times the size of "The Iraq War Logs", the world's previously largest classified information release).
The cables cover from 28th December 1966 to 28th February 2010 and originate from 274 embassies, consulates and diplomatic missions.

How to explore the data

Search for events that you remember that happened for example in your country. You can browse by date or search for an origin near you.
Pick out interesting events and tell others about them. Use twitter, reddit, mail whatever suits your audience best.
For twitter or other social networking services please use the #cablegate or unique reference ID (e.g.#66BUENOSAIRES2481) as hash tags.

Key figures:

  • 15, 652 secret
  • 101,748 confidential
  • 133,887 unclassified
  • Iraq most discussed country – 15,365 (Cables coming from Iraq – 6,677)
  • Ankara, Turkey had most cables coming from it – 7,918
  • From Secretary of State office - 8,017

According to the US State Departments labeling system, the most frequent subjects discussed are:
  • External political relations – 145,451
  • Internal government affairs – 122,896
  • Human rights – 55,211
  • Economic Conditions – 49,044
  • Terrorists and terrorism – 28,801
  • UN security council – 6,532


    Source: Wikileaks Article   ***

    New link is available for the Cable Gates. Click here

    *** Last night GMT +06:00 after 12 am (May be) Wikileaks Website has founded by using this DOMAIN.